portal
  Home About us Reports Charts News Custom Company Scan  
Report Charts News
*
Title Content
Economy&Goods
  Economy
  ConsumerGoods
  Food&Beverage
  Agriculture
Life Sciences
  Biotechnology
  Medical
  Pharmaceutical
Manufacturing
  Automotive
  Chemical
  Energy
  Machinery
  Material
  Metals & Minerals
Public Sector
  Environment
  Finance Service
  Infrastructure
  Logistics
  Real Estate
  Retailing
  Tourism
  Training
Technology And Media
  Electronics
  Internet
  Hardware
  Media
  Software
  Telecommunications

Tel: 0086-10-82600828
Fax: 0086-10-82601570
Email:


 Hotel sues China Unicom over pricing
 
CreateTime:2012-03-19     Source:cn-c114 Editor:liuhongli
Text Size:       
 

A local four-star hotel is suing China Unicom, accusing the telecommunications giant of violating the Chinese Antimonopoly Law by forcing the hotel to pay for a bundled broadband service at a price much higher than the market price, the Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate People's Court said yesterday.

Shanghai Kingtown Hotel, on Tianshan Road in Changning District, said it signed a contract with China Netcom in July 2007 in which the hotel was allowed to use 10 fixed-line telephone numbers with a minimum monthly call charge of 12,500 yuan (US$1,975).

Kingtown also agreed to pay 9,000 yuan per month to rent an exclusive broadband with a LAN bandwidth of 6 Mbps (megabytes per second). The contract was for eight years.

Kingtown said it had tried to negotiate a lower service fee after the hotel discovered its actual monthly telephone expense was only 3,000 yuan and the price of broadband services was cut greatly a few years after the contract was signed. But China Netcom, which merged with China Unicom in 2008, did not agree.

Last August, Kingtown sent a letter to China Unicom, saying it would stop using the current broadband starting last September 1 and asked the company to return the rest of the broadband fees it had already paid.

The hotel brought the case to court after China Unicom refused the request on September 7. China Unicom is arguing that the contract is binding because it was signed before the law came into effect in 2008.

The court did not reach a verdict yesterday.

 


Related Reports
Global and China RFID Industry Report, 2016-2020
China 2D Barcode Scanner Industry Report, 2015-2019
China Computer Software Industry Report, 2014-2017
China Navigation Map Market Report, 2008-2009
2005-2021 www.researchinchina.com All Rights Reserved 京ICP备05069564号-1